Baosheng Zhang
Abstract
Since 1978, Chinese evidence law has experienced significant changes and is now entering a rapid developmental stage prompted by the ongoing judicial reform. In general, current evidence law of China suffers from many issues ranging from absence of deep conceptulization, mistaken principles, overlap of contents, and lack of uniformity in application. Although some representatives of the National People's Congress persist with proposals of drafting a separate evidence code,coordinating evidence law with the existing three major procedural laws in Chinaremains to be an extremely challenging and complicated task. In the short term, the most practical approach is for the Supreme People’s Court to enact a set of Provisions on Procedural Evidence of the People’s Court by cooperating all current evidence rules scattered in the three major procedural laws and producing a unified set of judicial interpretations. This approach does not reinvent the wheel but only seeks to “upgrade the software.” It can achieve the goal of “integrating three sets of evidence rules” by systematically compiling current evidence rules, theoretical reconstruction to remedy the absence of conceptulization, eliminating redundancy through combining identical terms, and eradicating mistaken principles through a thorough system rebuilding. However, law schools in China have ignored evidence law education for a long time, resulting in considerable difficulties in this effort, such as lack of up-to-date knowledge of, and adherence to outdated concepts by, the law makers. Therefore, strengthening evidence law education and cultivating a new generation of talents equipped with the scientific knowledge of evidence law is the key to further development of evidence law in China.
Keywords: Evidence Law; Developmental Stage; Problems and Reconstruction;
Integration of Three Sets of Evidence Rules; Evidence Law Education
Network address:http://www.bu.edu/ilj/files/2015/03/Baosheng-Zhang-Reflecting-on-Develop...